Ethical Issues Involved in End-of-Life Decision-Making Essay

End-of-life decision-making entails calculateing into respectable, cultural, as well as, sanctioned concerns. All of the aforementioned has to be cautiously considered if one has to decide to end his or her own life. This paper w ailing look into the ethical, cultural, and legal issues that go on with end-of-life decision-making. It as well intends to state what therapist screwing guide in his or her participation in the discussion of end-of-life decision making unneurotic with his or her colleagues, as well as, perseverings & their families. honest Issues touch on in End-of-Life Decision-MakingThere atomic number 18 ethical indispensable issues problematical in end-of-life decision-making and well-nigh atomic number 18 the following commencement of all is the issue on utilitarianism, since this is verbalise to be the foundation of morals accordingly it is linked to the end-of-life decision-making as well (Ebenstein & Ebenstein 1991, p. 580). Here, it is utter tha t actions be right in equaliser as they tend to promote happiness, rail at as they tend to produce the move around of happiness (Ebenstein & Ebenstein 1991, p. 580). Happiness here is regarded as the absence seizure of pain and unhappiness is the front end of the aforementioned (Germino 1972, p.240). It is an issue because happiness is non all that matters in ending a life (Ebenstein & Ebenstein 1991, p. 580). In increase to that, how can one be sure that the absence of pain, which is death in this case, go forth work to happiness of the virtuallybody chiefly involved in the end-of-life decision-making (Ebenstein & Ebenstein 1991, p. 580)? The like is true with the family of principal(prenominal) person involved, ordain they be envision happiness if the patient opts to end his or her life voluntarily instead of postponement for his or her natural death to occupy place (Ebenstein & Ebenstein 1991, p.580)? Second is the issue cogitate with the Kantian model or what i s technically referred to as the deontological theory (Bennagen, 2000, p. 50). This states that a person has to fulfill a certain responsibleness or traffic as a part of his objective (Bennagen, 2000, p. 50). This statement instantaneously seems to be irrational since the concrete rendering of a righteousness or duty is not provided (Bennagen, 2000, p. 50). For example, is it the persons responsibility to subject himself or herself to death (Bennagen, 2000, p.50). It whitethorn be his or her right to compact in to live or die nevertheless if asked if it is his or her responsibility remains a big question (Bennagen, 2000, p. 50). snap off way plainly not least, there atomic number 18 well-nigh health care providers who are passing conscious ab come forward how much gold is spent on patients and how effectively it is spent (Hinman, 2000, p. 9). Some individuals feel that the amount of money spent on terminally ill patients is not really worth it (Hinman, 2000, p. 9).T his is super unethical it is as if one is proverb that money is far more historic than actually trying to save a life (Hinman, 2000, p. 9). Cultural Issues Involved in End of Life Decision-Making Furthermore, there are several cultural issues involved in end-of-life decision-making as well and whatever are the following First of all, there are some pieces of a cultural minority that prefers to be spoken to directly with regards to the disorder that they are going through (Searight et. al. , 2005, p. 516). Although, there are in like manner some who do not (Searight et.al. , 2005, p. 516. ). In fact some immediate family members request that they be the ones to be spoken to only since they believe that making known the patient pull up stakes only baffle the patient feel worse and will finally negatively affect him or her (Searight et. al. , 2005, p. 516. ). The same is true when it comes to making decisions with regards to the medications/ discourse that the patient will undergo some family members prefer that they be the ones to be in charge about this instead of the rectify and/or the patient (Searight et. al. , 2005, p. 516. ).Second, patients who belong to a cultural group sometimes opt not to be directly certified about the disease he or she is going through especially if its a life-threatening one (Searight et. al. , 2005, p. 516. ). Third, some patients also would prefer to carry out certain religious activities and spiritual traditions so as to assist in their health check intervention, and eventually, their healing as well (Searight et. al. , 2005, p. 516. ). Last scarcely not least, some patients take into consideration their beliefs and outlook when it comes to the medical experts, suffering, as well as, the afterlife (Searight et.al. , 2005, p. 516. ). licit Issues Involved in End-of-Life Decision-Making There are also certain legal concerns when it comes to end-of-life decision-making Most of the States disallows doc-assisted fe lo-de-se for example in New York, it is criminal under the general homicide laws (Legal Status of assisted/Euthanasia in the United States, n. d. , n. p. ). The same is true in Virginia wherein there is no law that actually covers physician-assisted self-destruction but there is a statute which imposes well-behaved sanctions on persons assisting in a suicide (Legal Status of Assisted/Euthanasia in the United States, n.d. , n. p. ). My Participation as a Therapist in the Discussion of End-of-Life Decision-Making along with Colleagues There are several things that I may contribute as a therapist to my colleagues. I can portion out with them my knowledge with regards to how to communicate with patients of diverse refinement (Searight et. al. , 2005, p. 521. ). I can request them to record an interest to the patients cultural heritage for them to be able to give the patient culturally-sensitive care (Searight et.al. , 2005, p. 521. ). In addition to that, I will also let them know that it is important to give the patient autonomy especially when it comes to non-disclosure of medical information and family-centered decision-making because through the aforementioned, the patient will eventually feel that their cultural norms are creation look uponed (Searight et. al. , 2005, p. 521. ). My Participation as a Therapist in the Discussion of End-of-Life Decision-Making along Patients and their FamiliesFinally, I may also be of great assistance to patients and their families with regards to their discussion of end-of-life decision-making through the following 1) I will respect it if the patient prefers that his or her family members be the recipients of symptomatic and sermon information 2) I will make sure first who is the member of the family whos appointed to make treatment decisions before speaking to him or her or giving them an advice with regards to the medical procedures or treatment and 3)I will help them lift another therapist/physician in case they ar e uncomfortable with the certain one and especially if their therapist/physician belong to the different ethnic ambit (Searight et. al. , 2005, p. 521. ). As a therapist, I will try to advise them the best I can while considering their cultural background, incorporating my ethical/moral standards, and making sure that I will abide by the laws as well.ReferencesBennagen, P. (2000). Social Economic and Political Thought. Q. C. UP Press. Ebenstein, W. and Ebenstein, A. 1991, Great Political Thinkers Plato to the President.Harcourt Brace, Forth Worth. Germino, D. 1972, Machiavelli to Marx advanced Western Political Thought. University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Hinman, L. M. (2000). honourable Issues in End of Life Decisions A Guide to Understanding Differences. Retrieved April 28, 2008 from http//ethics. sandiego. edu/presentations/sharp/index_files/v3_document. htm Legal Status of Assisted/Euthanasia in the United States. (n. d. ). Retrieved April 28, 2008 from http//www. nightin galealliance. org/pdf/state_grid. pdf Searight, H. R. & Gafford, J. (2005). Cultural Diversity at the End of Life Issues and Guidelines for Family Physicians. American Family Physician, 71(3), 515 522.